<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bo the Puptastic Premier Pooch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultsha.com/bo-the-puptastic-premier-pooch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultsha.com/bo-the-puptastic-premier-pooch/</link>
	<description>Belittle Your Peers With Knowledge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 16:22:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Wright</title>
		<link>http://cultsha.com/bo-the-puptastic-premier-pooch/comment-page-1/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cultsha.com/?p=639#comment-692</guid>
		<description>I saw this dog story in a broadsheet newspaper the other day; it&#039;s just a dog for goodness&#039; sake.  And, talking of papers, I read the London Paper and the infinitely superior London Lite (clearly a baronet among free sheets) for the first time on the way home tonight, and it&#039;s obvious that this whole celebrity thing is getting out of hand.  I&#039;m a bit backward when it comes to keeping up with the latest trends - as reflected in the press, on television, the internet, or wherever - but now all these types of newspapers (the cheap or free ones read by poor people) seem to have a colour spread showing celebrities in all their finery, mucking around and showing off.  Who&#039;s interested in this rubbish?  The London Lite (clearly a baronet among free sheets) also has a column listing people&#039;s text messages - clearly all contrived and made up by poseurs, or the people who work for the paper, mucking about and showing off.  Probably crowing to each other how off-the-wall and &#039;cool&#039; their one-liners are.  Who&#039;s interested in this rubbish?  So, even though the London Paper and the London Lite (clearly a baronet among free sheets, as I&#039;ve said) are a good read on the Underground, really they&#039;re rubbish and not fit to line Obama&#039;s dog&#039;s litter tray, being full of &#039;no talent celebrity&#039; pictures, and vacuous one-liners by the staff mucking about and showing off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this dog story in a broadsheet newspaper the other day; it&#8217;s just a dog for goodness&#8217; sake.  And, talking of papers, I read the London Paper and the infinitely superior London Lite (clearly a baronet among free sheets) for the first time on the way home tonight, and it&#8217;s obvious that this whole celebrity thing is getting out of hand.  I&#8217;m a bit backward when it comes to keeping up with the latest trends &#8211; as reflected in the press, on television, the internet, or wherever &#8211; but now all these types of newspapers (the cheap or free ones read by poor people) seem to have a colour spread showing celebrities in all their finery, mucking around and showing off.  Who&#8217;s interested in this rubbish?  The London Lite (clearly a baronet among free sheets) also has a column listing people&#8217;s text messages &#8211; clearly all contrived and made up by poseurs, or the people who work for the paper, mucking about and showing off.  Probably crowing to each other how off-the-wall and &#8216;cool&#8217; their one-liners are.  Who&#8217;s interested in this rubbish?  So, even though the London Paper and the London Lite (clearly a baronet among free sheets, as I&#8217;ve said) are a good read on the Underground, really they&#8217;re rubbish and not fit to line Obama&#8217;s dog&#8217;s litter tray, being full of &#8216;no talent celebrity&#8217; pictures, and vacuous one-liners by the staff mucking about and showing off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
